Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeper
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jul 11, 2017

Version 4.7.0 of pino just got published.

Dependency pino
Current Version 4.6.0
Type dependency

The version 4.7.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of pino.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 10 commits.

  • 3e309d3 Bumped v4.7.0.
  • 4e619f0 Added node 8 to travis.
  • 836d855 Updated chalk to v2.0.0.
  • ce10ba1 Merge pull request #268 from pinojs/fast-child
  • c14a0ef Replace that with self in applyOptions.
  • 9522423 Slice off some ms in some happy-paths
  • df540c2 Faster child() implementation.
  • f09549c Merge pull request #264 from vladgolubev/patch-1
  • 0343c4e Add missing logstash link in docs/transports.md
  • 09d5990 Do not cause problems to turbofan (#260)

See the full diff

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2017
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jul 17, 2017

Version 4.7.1 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits.

  • b1f753c v4.7.1
  • 329634e Merge branch 'issue-263'
  • 54a2f8d Reword reasoning for out-of-process benefit
  • ba20e87 Remove expected clause
  • 4f487a2 Add not to transports about wrapping and pino-multi-stream
  • e366286 Add a detailed overview of transports to initial readme

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant