Skip to content

Conversation

@mbdevpl
Copy link
Owner

@mbdevpl mbdevpl commented May 20, 2025

No description provided.

@mbdevpl mbdevpl self-assigned this May 20, 2025
@jenkins-mbdev
Copy link

jenkins-mbdev bot commented May 20, 2025

Tools report for GitHub-mbdevpl/version-query/PR-29 [build #7]:

  • Pylint: ran 🆗

  • Mypy: ran 🆗

  • Flake518: ran 🆗

  • Pydocstyle: ran 🆗

  • Coverage: 98% 🆗 (click for details)
    Name                                 Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    setup.py                                11      0      2      0   100%
    test/__init__.py                         5      0      0      0   100%
    test/examples.py                        48      1      4      1    96%   22
    test/test_cli.py                        54      0      0      0   100%
    test/test_git.py                       195      0     18      0   100%
    test/test_local_git_version.py          11      0      0      0   100%
    test/test_packaging.py                   3      0      0      0   100%
    test/test_query.py                     112      2      4      0    98%   89-90
    test/test_version.py                   153      0     32      0   100%
    version_query/__init__.py                5      0      0      0   100%
    version_query/__main__.py                9      0      2      0   100%
    version_query/_version.py                2      0      0      0   100%
    version_query/git_query.py             117      1     46      1    99%   75
    version_query/local_git_version.py       7      0      0      0   100%
    version_query/main.py                   21      0      6      0   100%
    version_query/parser.py                 36      0      8      0   100%
    version_query/patterns.py               25      0      0      0   100%
    version_query/py_query.py               45      7     18      3    84%   14-17, 38, 40, 57
    version_query/query.py                  50      0      2      0   100%
    version_query/version.py               393      9    200      8    97%   68, 78, 89, 94, 96, 125, 277, 445, 458
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TOTAL                                 1302     20    342     13    98%
    

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.0%. Comparing base (8c1ec59) to head (42b845e).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #29   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   98.0%   98.0%           
=====================================
  Files         18      20    +2     
  Lines       1284    1302   +18     
  Branches     171     171           
=====================================
+ Hits        1259    1277   +18     
  Misses        13      13           
  Partials      12      12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mbdevpl mbdevpl changed the title support usage of setuptools dynamic version in pyproject.toml support usage of dynamic version from attribute in pyproject.toml May 20, 2025
@jenkins-mbdev
Copy link

jenkins-mbdev bot commented May 20, 2025

PR build broken: GitHub-mbdevpl/version-query/PR-29 [build #4]

@mbdevpl mbdevpl force-pushed the feature/pyproject-dynamic-version branch from 0f4d4a4 to 80cc375 Compare May 20, 2025 11:13
@jenkins-mbdev
Copy link

jenkins-mbdev bot commented May 20, 2025

PR build fixed: GitHub-mbdevpl/version-query/PR-29 [build #6]

@mbdevpl mbdevpl merged commit b1d91ae into main Sep 21, 2025
27 checks passed
@mbdevpl mbdevpl deleted the feature/pyproject-dynamic-version branch September 21, 2025 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants