-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
[Snyk] Fix for 3 vulnerabilities #1237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-14157807 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-14157810 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-SQLPARSE-14157217
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR attempts to address security vulnerabilities identified by Snyk, but only partially implements the described fixes. The PR metadata claims to fix 3 vulnerabilities by upgrading Django (3.2.25 → 4.2.27) and sqlparse (0.4.4 → 0.5.4), but the actual changes only add a sqlparse version pin. The Django upgrade mentioned in the metadata is not reflected in the diff, and the current file already contains Django 5.2.7 (not 3.2.25 as stated in the PR description), suggesting a mismatch between the Snyk analysis and the actual codebase state.
Key changes:
- Adds
sqlparse>=0.5.4to address a SQL injection vulnerability - No Django version changes are present in the diff despite being mentioned in the PR metadata
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| # Xlwt | ||
| # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| xlwt==1.3.0 | ||
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Copilot
AI
Dec 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The sqlparse security pin should be placed in the "SECURITY UPDATES" section (after line 138) along with other Snyk pins like certifi and requests, rather than at the end of the file after unrelated sections. This maintains better organization and makes security-related dependencies easier to locate and manage.
| # Xlwt | ||
| # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| xlwt==1.3.0 | ||
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Copilot
AI
Dec 7, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing space after '#' in the comment. Should be # not directly required (with a space) to match the formatting style used in lines 137-138 for other Snyk security pins.
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability | |
| sqlparse>=0.5.4 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability |
Snyk has created this PR to fix 3 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
requirements/base.txtImportant
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 SQL Injection
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling